Ur-Starchildren as Viral Agents of the Void

Discussion in 'BMP - Public' started by Will, Jul 13, 2019.

  1. Will

    Will New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2016
    Posts:
    7
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Someone who knows more about Edenism, Buddhism and Indo-Chinese physiognomy than I do should fact-check everything I’m about to say cuz I’m talking out me arse.
    -
    I’ve seen SC psychology described like this:

    Laterally oriented, empathetic, focused on synthesis and opposed to distinction, motivated by peace and the desire to share it. Desiring to ‘re-write’ others into more ‘harmonious’ being.
    Isn’t this Buddhism? The religion which says: “I am you. You are me. We are the universal whole. Your ego and identity is the cause of your suffering. Cast it off, become one with us.”

    We’re talking phrenology, so it’s given that we assume that a person’s philosophy can be directly influenced by their own biology. Likewise, there are some philosophies one can only truly accept and live if one is of are of a certain biology.

    So, if one has an interest in manipulating others philosophy and perpetuating their own, in changing the ‘spiritual potential energy’ of a person/people/place/planet into something more ‘preferable’, the best way to go about it would be biologically.

    I remember there being two competing hypotheses: that Starchildren were just an offshoot of Melons, or that Starchildren were genuine descendants of aliens. Maybe both are true.
    With my layman eyes it seems to me that someone with temps is more likely to have par than not. The majority of Buddhist monks I’ve looked at have either parietal mass or temporal mass or both.
    Let’s follow this line of thought and use Buddhist thinking to reconcile the hypothetical Ur-Starchild psychology:

    Like a Buddhist sees a suffering man and thinks “If only he knew how to let go”, the Ur-SC sees earth and thinks the same thing. His motive is to gently, peacefully, lovingly, smother our souls. Like a cosmic trip-sitter, gently guiding us towards a permanent ego-death.

    Then, it seems clear why Melons and Starchildren seem so naturally opposed.

    Melons are all about identity, telos, the meaning of life we’re all searching for but can’t describe and some say is kept safely in God’s hands, and how that meaning relates to our identities.
    Starchildren see that all as a painful and vain lie. They see our existence as a pathology of matter, a woefully inefficient conversion of energy to joy, in dire need of refactoring.
    We see them as a virus, but they see themselves as the immune system, fighting malignant growth. And what does a good immune system do but go straight to the source of the cancer?
    The degenerate and abusive hierarchies of today are fated to collapse by their own evil nature. No threat of metastasis. But imagine a benevolent and altruistic civilization which actually has things figured out-- a civilization which actually has the potential to reach into millennia and go beyond what anyone else ever has. That’s something which needs to be rooted out at the source (Why though? If a benevolent civilization is rid of undue suffering then why does it need to end? Maybe because they see the overall purpose, the discovery of meaning, as ultimately ill-fated and empty. Or, maybe the ‘universal whole’ they claim to represent longs to be whole again, and errant civilizations living off stolen consciousness need to be ‘brought back home’. Or, maybe, seeding otherwise progressive civilizations with their own DNA such that said civilization will become them is just their mode of reproduction. Ur-Starchildren can at the very least be explained as an organism whose method of reproduction is the ‘biological terraforming’ of other species). Imagine there were the seeds of a promising melon civilization somewhere in indo-china, on the cusp of philosophical renaissance. Who knows what they would’ve become-- maybe the Ur-Starchildren deemed it necessary that someone with their sensibilities appear at the right time, in order to direct this immense spiritual-momentum into creating a more ‘desirable’ movement. Suddenly a bright melon-lass has a kid with a weirdly wide-head and a philosophy which, on one hand exploits the parietal’s desire to revere a transcendent power, and on the other hand contains the possibly nefarious seeds of Ur-SC doctrine.

    I don’t know what Siddhārtha Gautama actually looked like, but these skulls seem similar. [​IMG] [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    The average Tibetan man seems to have a wider skull than usual.
    [​IMG]

    Maybe my fear of Greys as a child was rooted in Genetic memory.

    Why don’t we ever see any aylmao’s flying around? Well, why would a good Buddhist disturb the peace? Space looks best when it’s still, silent, and empty. A perfect portrait of nirvana.
    Why would they come down here themselves when they can talk to us through drugs and have Joe Rogan preach their doctrine of nothingness on the most popular podcast in the world?
    Slow and steady goes the rowboat called earth into an endless and hungry black sea we call ‘death’, but they call ‘peace’. Maybe they gave us this technology to show us the limits and absurdity of our existence, while guiding us into a more connected whole.

    And why aren’t Ur-Melons directly intervening? The center of identity is the ability to choose, and we mustn’t be deprived of the right to choose for ourselves between the comfort of the void offered by the Ays or the crucible of meaningful existence offered by God. Let the sea be the sea and fall back into itself, let life rise from it. Maybe the ‘cosmic filter’ is this: Those who are weak choose to dissolve back into what they once were, and those who are strong transcend, and are taken up to be with God-- leaving this place empty.

    Regardless of all this ‘woo’, the similarities between described Starchild psychology and Buddhist philosophy shouldn’t be ignored-- I see a lot of temps in Asia. Maybe that’s a lead to the SC origin story. And maybe this is old news.
     
    • Nobilid Nobilid x 2
    • Thank Thank x 1
  2. Robotnick

    Robotnick Well-Known Member Typed

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2016
    Posts:
    368
    Thanks Received:
    308
    Eckhart Tolle seems to be an obvious example

     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Robotnick

    Robotnick Well-Known Member Typed

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2016
    Posts:
    368
    Thanks Received:
    308
    My knowledge of Buddhism is limited, but Tibetan Buddhism has marked differences from more original buddhism best represented by the Theravada school.
    It makes sense that Tibetan Buddhism emphasizes compassion, universal love, and the supposed "one-ness" of everything, while the Theravadens would denounce most of this as nonsense.

    I see Buddhism as a method, a potential tool to help clear the mind of disadvantageous conditioning and attachments so that one can start anew, and master the mind, and transcend the intellect. The hyperactivity of, and attachment to intellect is what is driving the Neurosis of the modern European descended man (or thallish people in general) to large degree.

    Contrast Evola's take to that of the Tibetans and modern western conceptions of Buddhism. It makes sense that Tibetan Buddhism is the most popular in the west.
     
  4. Will

    Will New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2016
    Posts:
    7
    Thanks Received:
    5
    If I knew how to 'thank' posts, I would. I definitely respect Buddhism in the form you're describing. Interesting-- in that case that the hypothesis is correct, the birth of Tibetan from Theravadic = Starchild from Melon. But, this seems incorrect. SC-esque skulls have existed before then-- Marcus Crassus, Pompey, Caligula, (Caesar, maybe). And the psychology of those guys doesn't seem to fit SC.
    Some Ideas:
    Temps + T-front = Crassus, Pompey, Caesar, Caligula, Gary Vaynerchuck -- Temps + M-Front (Or SC front I can't tell the difference) = Tibetan Buddhists, Eckhart Tolle . I can't find any backcone or anything reminiscent of Arch-Melons in ancient Rome. Hmmmmmm.
    I was thinking that Arch-Melons may be brachycephalic SC sidemass pulled outward by Dolichocelphalic Thal genes, but what I just said seems to disprove that.
    Where did all the ST's go?
    How did Thals mate with Arch-Melons if they lived so far apart? Maybe they didn't until very recently. I wonder who was the earliest recorded MT or TM-- do people have an idea of the first time Thal and Melon civs met?
     
  5. BiceBiceBice

    BiceBiceBice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2016
    Posts:
    608
    Thanks Received:
    296
    "Maybe my fear of Greys as a child was rooted in Genetic memory."

    The most famous SC with still living repercussions was/is mao zedong. Seeing the way the Borgonizer is going, itz plausible that grey aliens in flying saucers are chingchongs who returned to earth from the past via some wormhole.
    I don't see the communist party worshipping satan trafficking children for rituals, like western melonoids, they just like replacement bodyparts for practical reasons.

    SC is probably more Denisovan, and melonboons are (more) thal/sape mix inb4 other extinct hominoids thrown into the mix.
    Whatever the actual 100% difference, they are hella different in their modus operandi. Melons are lessers to the SC, like a child vs an adult, immature vs mature neanderthards being manchildren all their lives.

    +1 Nobilid
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  6. Robotnick

    Robotnick Well-Known Member Typed

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2016
    Posts:
    368
    Thanks Received:
    308
    Neanderthards are often lost manchildren because they simply aren't meant for mass societies. They are built for applying intelligence to actual things and problems rather than navigating through masses of perpetually social-climbing striving people.

    Melonheads subject everything under them to a brutal teleological grinder. Starchildren are working to end that and create a massive hive of synchronized egoless people living in harmony, hence all the new-age bs arising,

    while Thals just want to live and be happy with their tribe and go on adventures, etc...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Kensuimo

    Kensuimo Well-Known Member Typed

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2016
    Posts:
    1,760
    Thanks Received:
    609
    Dude, awesome post. In no particular order:

    -No way Zedong is starchild, even a hybrid. Likely backswept. Possible melon frontal, which is interesting because he had practically no frontal. Most M-frontal Europeans have abundant frontal and prefrontal.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    -Agreed, Vaynerchuck's eyes are ambiguous. I'm leaning SM but it could well just be Eastern European baseline.

    -Tolle is decidedly crinklesock, i.e. starchild front. It's difficult to describe what characterizes a high magnitude of it other than "it looks really crinkly!" but he's got it.

    -Caesar was not T front. Ensure you use the Tusculum bust for analysis, it's the only accurate one. He seems to have had occ. Also longface, which is rare for starchildren.
    [​IMG]


    -Thank button is the thumbs up icon at the bottom of a post, amongst others.

    -Tesla is the best example of ST in my opinion. Ram Dass was (M/S)T, as was Richard Bach.

    -Hideaki Anno, creator of Evangelion, is (T/S)S. The moral of Eva is actually a warning against hivemind- this seems counterintuitive. Perhaps his occ won out.
    [​IMG]

    -Bice, your maturity paradox is indeed intriguing. Melons set cultural norms so by those starchildren come across as layabouts, but when they're able to engage the melon face to face it's often no contest.
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2019 at 6:09 PM
  8. Robotnick

    Robotnick Well-Known Member Typed

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2016
    Posts:
    368
    Thanks Received:
    308
    Mao was very much a country boy ironically. Which I think isn't surprising considering the low sloped forehead.

    He even preferred out-houses to toilets. He hated the idea of sewage pipes in the house lol.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page